Digital application of clinical staging to support stratification in youth mental health services: Validity and reliability study
Publication Details
Chong, M.,
Hickie, I.,
Cross, S.,
McKenna, S.,
Varidel, M.,
Capon, W.,
Davenport, T.,
LaMonica, H.,
Sawrikar, V.,
Guastella, A.,
Naismith, S.,
Scott, E.,
&
Iorfino, F.
(2023).
Digital application of clinical staging to support stratification in youth mental health services: Validity and reliability study.
JMIR Formative Research, 7.
Abstract
Background: As the demand for youth mental health care continues to rise, managing wait times and reducing treatment delays are key challenges to delivering timely and quality care. Clinical staging is a heuristic model for youth mental health that can stratify care allocation according to individuals’risk of illness progression. The application of staging has been traditionally limited to trained clinicians yet leveraging digital technologies to apply clinical staging could increase the scalability and usability of this model in services.
Objective: The aim of this study was to validate a digital algorithm to accurately differentiate young people at lower and higher risk of developing mental disorders.
Methods: We conducted a study with a cohort comprising 131 young people, aged between 16 and 25 years, who presented to youth mental health services in Australia between November 2018 and March 2021. Expert psychiatrists independently assigned clinical stages (either stage 1a or stage 1b+), which were then compared to the digital algorithm’s allocation based on a multidimensional self-report questionnaire.
Results: Of the 131 participants, the mean age was 20.3 (SD 2.4) years, and 72% (94/131) of them were female. Ninety-one percent of clinical stage ratings were concordant between the digital algorithm and the experts’ ratings, with a substantial interrater agreement (κ=0.67; P<.001). The algorithm demonstrated an accuracy of 91% (95% CI 86%-95%; P=.03), a sensitivity of 80%, a specificity of 93%, and an F1-score of 73%. Of the concordant ratings, 16 young people were allocated to stage 1a, while 103 were assigned to stage 1b+. Among the 12 discordant cases, the digital algorithm allocated a lower stage (stage 1a) to 8 participants compared to the experts. These individuals had significantly milder symptoms of depression (P<.001) and anxiety (P<.001) compared to those with concordant stage 1b+ ratings.
Conclusions: This novel digital algorithm is sufficiently robust to be used as an adjunctive decision support tool to stratify care and assist with demand management in youth mental health services. This work could transform care pathways and expedite care allocation for those in the early stages of common anxiety and depressive disorders. Between 11% and 27% of young people seeking care may benefit from low-intensity, self-directed, or brief interventions. Findings from this study suggest the possibility of redirecting clinical capacity to focus on individuals in stage 1b+ for further assessment and intervention.
Keywords
clinical staging, digital health solution, online diagnosis, service transformation, staged care, stratified care
Link to Publisher Version (URL)
