Long-term echocardiographic and clinical outcomes after invasive and non-invasive therapies for sub-massive and massive acute pulmonary embolism
Publication Details
Robinson, H.,
Anstey, M.,
Litton, E.,
Ho, K.,
Jacques, A.,
RathoreRathoreRathoreRathoreRathore, K.,
Yep, T.,
Lucas, M.,
Worthy, L.,
Tan, J.,
Yeoh, M.,
Yau, H.,
Robinson, K.,
Mudie, J.,
Hennelly, G.,
&
Wibrow, B.
(2024).
Long-term echocardiographic and clinical outcomes after invasive and non-invasive therapies for sub-massive and massive acute pulmonary embolism.
Heart Lung and Circulation, Early View (Online First).
Abstract
Aim: Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a significant cause of mortality in the hospital setting. The objective of this study was to outline the long-term outcomes after surgical and non-surgical management for patients with massive and submassive PE.
Methods: Population cohort observational study evaluating all patients who presented to three tertiary hospitals in the state of Western Australia with access to cardiothoracic services over 5 years (2013–2018). Reviewed notes of all patients as well as radiology, linked mortality data and all available echocardiography studies at the primary hospital.
Results: In total, 245 patients were identified, of which 41 received surgical management and 204 non-surgical management; demographic data was similar. Clinically, the surgical group had higher rates of shock requiring vasopressors, severe bradycardia, or cardiopulmonary resuscitation prior to intervention. The 28-day mortality was not statistically significantly different between the surgical embolectomy group (2/41 [4.2%]) and the non-surgical group (17/201 [8.3%]) (p=0.382). There was no difference in 12-month mortality, including when this was adjusted for vasopressors, right ventricular (RV) strain, troponin, and brain natriuretic peptide. In the massive PE sub-group, 28-day mortality was not significantly different: 2/29 (6.9%) surgical group vs 7/34 (20.2%) non-surgical group (p=0.064). Higher rates of severe RV impairment and dilatation were present in the surgical group. All patients with available echocardiography studies at outpatient follow-up returned to normal or mild RV impairment.
Conclusion: Patients who presented with massive or submassive PE had similar outcomes whether treated with surgical or non-surgical management. Surgical embolectomy is a safe option in a cardiothoracic centre setting
Keywords
Pulmonary embolus, Pulmonary embolectomy, Cardiac surgery, Intensive care