<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Theology Conference Papers</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 University of Notre Dame Australia All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theo_conference</link>
<description>Recent documents in Theology Conference Papers</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 00:09:46 PST</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>


	
		
	







<item>
<title>Jesus the Gardener: A Revised Perspective of a Favourite New Testament Scene</title>
<link>http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theo_conference/12</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theo_conference/12</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 19:14:43 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Mary Magdalene’s encounter with the risen Christ in the garden in which he was entombed, described in John 20:14-15, is one of the most poignant in the entire Bible.  If we are to accept the interpretation of some commentaries, Mary, when she finds the tomb empty, in her grief induced confusion<a title="">[1]</a> fails to recognise Jesus when he appears to her, supposing him to be the gardener. Her fear is that the same people who have killed him have removed his body. It is only when Jesus calls to her by name that there ensues what has been described as  “the greatest recognition scene in all literature”<a title="">[2]</a>, one expressed in only two words: “Mary!”, “Rabboni!” It is implicit in Jesus’ response to her, i.e. “Do not hold onto me”, that she has moved to embrace him. The emotion is palpable.  <br /></p>
<p><a title="">[1]</a> See, for example, Judith Schubert, <em>The Gospel of John – Question by Question </em>(Mahwah NJ: Paulist Press, 2008), 236e.</p>
<p><a title="">[2]</a> Nicolas Wyatt, citing MacGregor, in  “’Supposing Him to Be the Gardener’ (John 20, 15. A Study of the Paradise Motif in John” in Zeitschrift <em>f</em><em>ür die Neutestamentlice Wissenschaft und die Kunde der Älteren Kirche,</em> Vol 81, Issue 1-2(1990), 38.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Jim Cregan</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Jesus the Gardener – a View of the Garden Scene Through Text and Image</title>
<link>http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theo_conference/11</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theo_conference/11</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:50:54 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Our previous speaker, Jim Cregan, has given us a rich view of the notion of the Royal Gardener, the cosmic gardener, and the understanding that the gardener image is not simply a way of suggesting that Mary Magdalen was very confused, but rather the evangelist of the Fourth Gospel presenting us with a very rich symbol of the Risen Christ. From the garden of Eden, to the garden of Gethsemane and then to the garden of Paradise, the power of the symbol is there. As Jim noted, the allegorical motif of Jesus as the ‘cosmic gardener’ “achieved prominence in the Middle Ages but had its origins in much earlier Christian homiletics.”<a title="">[1]</a>  Katherine Jansen maintains that the reason for the popularity of this particular scene in the middle ages was the development of the cult of the Magdalen. This cult was powerfully developed by Dominican and Franciscan preachers who saw the Magdalen as the perfect penitent. Jansen has worked extensively on original sermons from the period not only to understand the voice of the institutional church as relayed through homiletic discourse, but she also found that the preachers responded to their audience’s feedback and hence the voice of the people can be heard as well.<a title="">[2]</a> Mary Magdalen was not a penitent prostitute. This misconception possibly originates in Gregory the Great’s homily in 591 where he identified the unknown woman sinner in Luke’s gospel as Mary Magdalen.<a title="">[3]</a> Hence the artworks that we have all identify her through her attributes (personally meaningful symbols), emblems (generic symbols) and symbols as the penitent prostitute.</p>
<p>While Jim limited his chosen pericope to verses 14-15, this paper explores the garden imagery from John 20:11-18 because the art through which this text will be viewed in some instances includes imagery relating to verses 11-18.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Angela McCarthy</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Expressing the Inexpressible: the work of Mons John Cyril Hawes, priest and architect</title>
<link>http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theo_conference/10</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theo_conference/10</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 23:42:45 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>What is the result of the combination of priest and architect, Anglican and Catholic heritage, English and Roman education in a deeply faith filled man?</p>
<p>The answer can be found in the hot and dry country of Geraldton Diocese Western Australia in the work of priest and architect Monsignor John Cyril Hawes (1876-1956). Hawes expresses the inexpressible through his many churches, hermitages, chapels, residential buildings and the Cathedral in Geraldton as well as other buildings in many other parts of the world. His deep and passionate faith is expressed in the eclectic use of symbols and forms encountered in his work and yet his buildings also express his concern for the human person as they ‘fit’ in the Mediterranean climate and are scaled to fit each community. This paper will explore Hawes’ visual theology made evident through his buildings in Western Australia and through the individual art works he created to live within those buildings. His iconography is ‘borrowed’ from many traditions and brought to life in a unique way in gargoyles, relief sculptures, paintings, baldachin, designs, stained glass windows, drawings and other artefacts. He was a man of his times and the challenge for those who live and worship in these buildings today is to preserve these earthly treasures of his legacy and yet function within them while celebrating liturgies in the 21<sup>st</sup> century.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Angela McCarthy</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Integration of Visual Art for Small Worshipping Communities</title>
<link>http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theo_conference/9</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theo_conference/9</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 18:58:25 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>A difficulty for small worshipping communities is having the resources and personnel to provide suitable enervating opportunities for reflection on the Word during worship that enriches and enlivens their community action. Research has shown that interaction with visual imagery assists contemplation and integration of text and will therefore assist those gathered to consider the Scripture of the day.</p>
<p>Visual imagery in art has been neglected as a source of theology and hence the vocabulary needed to ‘read’ the artworks relevant to Scripture will have to be re-learnt. This paper will provide an understanding of how visual arts can augment Scriptural understanding and the interaction within a small community. A list of symbols, attributes and emblems will be provided with visual examples so that this technique can be explored. Images are readily available through online sources and this augments the capacity of the small worshipping community to develop their resources.</p>
<p>Unlike large worshipping communities, the small community has the capacity to hear the voice of each person and therefore the response of each person to the visual art under consideration can deeply enrich the understanding of the Gospel in the community’s own context. As William Dryness says: “A carefully wrought and intelligent object or painting, when it is patiently observed, opens up windows on the human situation in a way that other cultural products cannot.” Such patient observance, when linked to Scripture, can beautifully augment the small community gathered in worship.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Angela M. McCarthy</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Pastoral Care and Counselling: Towards a Post-Metaphysical Theology of Friendship</title>
<link>http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theo_conference/8</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theo_conference/8</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:40:43 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The article sets out to develop an eschatological ethic of friendship to guide pastoral care and counselling towards a liberating practice. It uses post-metaphysical categories and terms from the ethical metaphysics of Emmanuel Levinas to enrich pastoral theology. The aim is to stretch compassion towards the future world of Isa 64: 4 and 1 Cor 2:9 in which we can announce a logos of friendship. By having such a sense of transcendence (an experience of a non-experience), compassion as friendship testifies to the Reign of God and to the very hope of encountering Christ in one another.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Glenn J. Morrison</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>The Preferential Option for the Poor - Liberation Theology, a Call to Action</title>
<link>http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theo_conference/7</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theo_conference/7</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:59:40 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Liberation Theology is a school of action which stems humanity of Christ which makes Him one with us, in suffering, in injustice, in loneliness, in poverty, and precisely because of them He understands and loves us deeply, keeping us company through the deserts of our lives. Although Stephen Pattison declares that the only way God can appear to a starving man is in “a loaf of bread, not in prayers or words of comfort.” He seems to speak from a very “first world – materialistic” view, away from Third World realities. It is then that a developed country pastoral theology becomes “myopic” and cannot see that for the poor of the poorest a hug, a look, a word, a smile, wrapped in real love and compassion mean more than a piece of bread. Disadvantaged people are not only hungry for food but for compassion, they lack absolutely everything, they are invisible, they only posses two things our indifference and our rejection. Mother Theresa (1910-1997) states:</p>
<p>"There are many in the world dying for a piece of bread … But there are many more dying for a little love."</p>
<p>Doing Liberation Theology is giving our-selves in love and in compassion to the poor. In sharing their fate we bring more than a loaf of bread that could be finished in an instant, we liberate ourselves and we liberate them by allowing the presence of God to dwell in the world, through action we acknowledge and make possible the incarnation of God and the coming of the Kingdom.</p>
<p>Not to be myopic let’s look at the world as Gutierrez does when he paraphrases Teilhard de Chardin and Charles Peguy:</p>
<p>“God is not at our back, pushing us along on our journey. God is before us, revealed in the thousands of faces of human beings in the different circumstances of life. So it is, that the faith that I love is hope … the hope of seeing God in my encounters with human beings."</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Megan Levy</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Re-Thinking Cosmology Ethically and Theologically in the Light of Emmanuel Lévinas&apos; Phenomenology of Evil</title>
<link>http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theo_conference/6</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theo_conference/6</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:43:16 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>This article uses the ethical metaphysics of the French-Jewish Philosopher and Talmudic Scholar, Emmanuel Lévinas, to advance a Judeo-Christian theological approach to Cosmology. Although Lévinas has been long noted by Christian theologians, his writings have not yet been considered by Science and, in particular, cosmology. It is argued that Lévinas' phenomenology of Evil provides an important foundation for creating an ethical Judeo-Christian approach to cosmology. Constituting three moments, namely, (i) Evil as Excess, (ii) Evil as an intention and (iii) Evil as hatred of Evil, his phenomenology of evil unveils two important cosmological findings: (i) the nature of the universe as God's disinterestedness and (ii) the origins of this nature as God's hatred of evil.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Glenn J. Morrison</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>An Authentic Human Being with a 17th C. Flair: Fenelon Spiritual Letters and Existentialism</title>
<link>http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theo_conference/5</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theo_conference/5</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 18:16:02 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>This is an invitation for the mind and the heart to cross the threshold into another dimension in time and explore the parallels between Existential Psychotherapy concepts and Fenelon’s Christian Spiritual Letters written 300 years ago. Christianity and Existentialism are “individualistic” approaches focused on self-awareness, self-responsibility, and ownership to facilitate personal change; both ask for commitment, and none of them offer easy ways or painless quests. Christian spiritual letters as a personal growth tool are centred on Jesus, a self-actualizer, who fits every characteristic described by Maslow.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Megan Levy</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Ethics at the Margins of Life: Encountering the Other</title>
<link>http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theo_conference/4</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theo_conference/4</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:29:22 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>This paper gives a Levinasian-inspired analysis of ethics at the margins of life. It begins by considering our present day obsession with technology and how it depersonalises the human condition. Everything revolves around the self. In bad faith, we become like ghosts haunting each other during the constant flow of impersonal communication. Following on, it introduces the concept of ethical transcendence as the basis in which the language of theology might be truly used beyond ontology, phenomenology and the category of objectivity. The paper introduces the ideas of the face, encounter, passivity, exposure and transcendence as the basis for a theological language of alterity. It argues that the Other or, the poor ones at the margins of life, precedes our knowledge, commitment and practice. The face of the Other is like a trauma that awakens, commands and ordains us to responsibility to the point of expiation, that is, to the extreme of being exposed to his or her wounds and bleeding for them. Albeit at the risk of objectivity and thematisation, the paper concludes that testifying for the Other’s wounds and outrage is glory in the sense of witnessing to both Christ and those at the margins of society.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Glenn J. Morrison</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>The Question of the Meaning of Religion: As belonging-to being-human</title>
<link>http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theo_conference/3</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theo_conference/3</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 23:29:19 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>If the ‘studies in religion’ are to be reinvented, we should ask: what foundation for this reinvention? or What foundation is appropriate for this particular historical horizon? This paper will take one stance towards this issue of foundation – in relation to the question of the meaning of Religion as a notion.</p>
<p>I take this theme of reinvention to be an opportunity to pose the question of the meaning of Religion as foundational in three ways: as the foundational concept of the study of religion, as the question of the methodological foundation of studies in religion, and finally, the question of an ontological foundation that provides a rigorous and flexible conceptualisation of Religion.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Angus Brook</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>The Many Voices of Lament: An Exploration of the Book of Lamentations</title>
<link>http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theo_conference/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theo_conference/2</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 22:45:58 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>In the year 586BCE, the city of Jerusalem was overrun and destroyed by the Babylonian armies of Nebuchadnezzar. The destruction of the city followed a protracted two year siege, with the armies surrounding the city and restricting the flow of food and water into Jerusalem. Famine spread, and death was rife. When Jerusalem was finally conquered, the Babylonians destroyed the entire fabric of Judean society. People were killed, buildings were destroyed, the king, the leaders and all but the poorest members of society were exiled. The Temple, the sacred centre heart of the nation, was levelled and its treasures carried off by the victorious army. The social, political and religious life of the nation was totally destroyed.</p>
<p>We can gain some insight into the pain and grief of the Jerusalem community through the book of Lamentations, which is thought to have developed in the period following the destruction of Jerusalem. As its name implies, Lamentations is a collection of lament poems in which the worshipping community gives voice to its pain.</p>
<p><strong>Boase, E. (2005). Many voices of lament: An exploration of the Book of Lamentations. <em>Australian Journal of Liturgy, 10</em>(1), 3-26.</strong></p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Elizabeth C. Boase</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>The (im)possibilities of Levinas for Christian Theology</title>
<link>http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theo_conference/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theo_conference/1</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:34:29 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The paper aims to show how Levinas’ philosophy opens up a style of thinking and suggests a vocabulary of expression that can serve Christian theology, especially by opening the possibility of a language of alterity, or radical “otherness”, in theology. Given our paradox of the (im)possibilities of Levinas for Christian theology and, hence, the very risk of falling into the language of onto-theology, the paper will firstly relate my approach to Levinas writings for the benefit of Christian theology.</p>
<p>My special concern for the talk will be to provide an example of doing theology with Levinas. To this end, I will engage the theology of von Balthasar, no less a complex and many-faceted thinker than Levinas himself. In this regard, the talk will be limited to exemplifying my approach through enhancing von Balthasar’s study of John 20:19-23 where the Risen Jesus identifies himself to the disciples, greets them with peace and initiates their mission with the power of the Holy Spirit. Our aim here is to provide a context to theologise with the language of alterity. Consequently, I will suggest four aspects of Levinas’ idea of illeity (diachrony, the immemorial, effacement and ambiguity) to uncover the sense of the non-phenomenality of the Risen Christ’s otherness and face. The talk, by seeking to go beyond von Balthasar’s language of theology to refer to the Risen Christ, will most likely result in the impossibility of keeping faithful to von Balthasar’s theological boundaries. Yet, it is a risk and a trespass worth attempting for theology to traverse beyond essence towards ethical transcendence.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Glenn J. Morrison</author>


</item>





</channel>
</rss>
