Title

Complex non-invasive fibrosis models are more accurate than simple models in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2011

Abstract

Background and Aim: Significant hepatic fibrosis is prognostic of liver morbidity and mortality in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), however it remains unclear whether non-invasive fibrosis models can determine this end-point. We therefore compared the accuracy of simple bed-side versus complex fibrosis models across a range of fibrosis in a multi-centre NAFLD cohort.

Methods: Simple (APRI, BARD) and complex (Hepascore, Fibrotest, FIB4) fibrosis models were calculated in 242 NAFLD subjects undergoing liver biopsy. Significant (F2-4) and advanced fibrosis (F3,4) were defined using Kleiner criteria. Models were compared using area under the receiver operator characteristic curves (AUC). Cut-offs were determined by Youden Index or 90% predictive values.

Results: For significant fibrosis, non-invasive fibrosis models had modest accuracy (AUC 0.707-0.743) with BARD being least accurate (AUC 0.609, p < 0.05 versus others). Using single cut-offs, sensitivities and predictive values were <80%; using two cut-offs, >75% of subjects fell within indeterminate ranges. Simple models had significantly more subjects within indeterminate ranges than complex models (99.1-100% vs. 82.1-84.4% respectively, p < 0.05 for all). For advanced fibrosis, complex models were more accurate than BARD (AUC 0.802-0.858 vs. 0.701, p < 0.05). Using two cut-offs, complex models had fewer individuals within indeterminate ranges than BARD (11.1%-32.3% vs. 70.7%, p < 0.01 for all). For cirrhosis, complex models had higher AUC values than simple models.

Conclusions: In NAFLD subjects, non-invasive models have modest accuracy for determining significant fibrosis and have predictive values less than 90% in the majority of subjects. Complex models are more accurate than simple bed-side models across a range of fibrosis.

Comments

Due to copyright restrictions the publisher's version/PDF of this article is unavailable for download.

Staff and Students of the University of Notre Dame Australia may access the full text of this article here

This article may be accessed from the publisher here

The Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology may be accessed from the National Library of Australia here

The Author:

Professor Max Bulsara



Share

COinS