Title
Iron Supplementation: Oral Tablets Versus Intramuscular Injection
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2006
Abstract
Non-anemic, iron depleted women were randomly assigned to an injection group (IG) or oral group (OG) to assess which method is more efficient for increasing iron stores over a short time period. IG received a course of 5 × 2 mL intramuscular injections over 10 d, and OG received one tablet daily for 30 d. Fourteen, 21 and 28 d after commencing supplementation, ferritin concentration in OG significantly increased from baseline (means ± standard error: 27 ± 3 to 40 ± 5 to 41 ± 5 to 41 ± 5 mg/L; P < 0.01). Similarly, on days 15, 20, and 28 post the first injection, ferritin concentration in IG significantly increased from baseline (means ± standard error: 20 ± 2 to 71 ± 17 to 63 ± 11 to 63 ± 7 mg/L; P < 0.01), and was also significantly greater than OG at day 15 and 28 (P < 0.05). Iron injections are significantly more effective (both in time and degree of increase) in improving ferritin levels over 30 d than oral tablets.
Recommended Citation
Dawson, B., Goodman, C., Blee, T., Claydon, G., Peeling, P., Beilby, J., et al. (2006). Iron supplementation: Oral tablets versus intramuscular injection. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism, 16(2), 180- 186.

Comments
Due to copyright restrictions the publisher's version/PDF of this article is unavailable for download.
Staff and Students of the University of Notre Dame Australia may access the full text of this article here
This article may be accessed from the publisher here
The International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism may be accessed from the National Library of Australia here
The Author:
Tanya Blee