Title
`Aufklärung', freemasonry, the public sphere and the question of Enlightenment
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2008
Abstract
That the Enlightenment was a movement reaching across at least three European countries (France, Germany and Britain) in the eighteenth century, with a similar platform in all three (social improvement on the basis of unassisted reason), is the current orthodoxy. Yet this view can only be accepted with qualifications. It is the intention of this essay to focus attention on these qualifications. A first objection lies with the fact that no platform of Enlightenment was articulated in any country in the eighteenth century apart from Germany. In the debate about Enlightenment initiated in the Berlinische Monatsschrift in 1783, Kant's insistence that Aufklärung must stay within political limits is considered characteristic not only of the German discussion, but indeed of all broadly Enlightenment thought from the beginning. In considering Koselleck's argument about the Enlightenment, which analysed this same conservatism, a second objection is apparent: the impulse to stay within the confines of the absolutist state suggests that eighteenth-century Enlightenment, politically speaking, was decidedly other than that which has subsequently been found within it.
Recommended Citation
Mehigan, T., & de Burgh, H. (2008). `Aufklärung', freemasonry, the public sphere and the question of Enlightenment. Journal of European Studies, 38(1), 5-25. doi:10.1177/0047244107086798
Comments
Due to copyright restrictions the publisher's version/PDF of this article is unavailable for download.
Staff and Students of the University of Notre Dame Australia may access the full text of this article here
This article may be accessed from the publisher here
The Journal of European Studies may be accessed from the National Library of Australia here