Title

Defending Marshall’s 'Masterpiece': Ralph Souter’s Critique of Robbins’ Essay

Document Type

Book review in a scholarly journal

Publication Date

2010

Abstract

We examine Ralph W. Souter's defence, in the 1930s, of Marshall's Principles against Robbins' attempt to recast economics as a 'purely formal science of implications'. Souter elaborated on Marshall's invocations progressively to increase the realism of economic science and contrasted this perspective on Marshall with Robbins' atomistic bias, neglect of historical time and irreversibilities, arbitrary restrictions on the scope of economic science and emphasis on logical and mathematical form over content. Souter demonstrates that Robbins takes a Walrasian-inspired perspective on Marshall's equilibrium concept whereas the 'authentically Marshallian' equilibrium notion generally incorporates potential for endogenous change. On this and other matters Souter has priority in drawing attention to Marshall's incipient 'evolutionary economics'.

Comments

Due to copyright restrictions this article is unavailable for download.

Staff and Students of the University of Notre Dame Australia may access the full text of this article here

This article may be accessed from the publisher here

The Cambridge Journal of Economics may be accessed from the National Library of Australia here


Link to Full Text

Share

COinS